next up previous
Next: Migrated Resources Up: Migrating LFG Resources into Previous: Distinctions between LFG and

The Type of Migration

The migration has been done manually, but a semi-automatically migration between LFG and ALEP seems to be feasible (see the algorithm described by Dieter Kohl and Stefan Momma in the ET 10/52 study, which was mainly based on the Charon-System developed at the IMS in Stuttgart, [ET-10/52-93]). The decision to make this migration in a manual fashion ha been dictated by two factors: the GWB platform was not transparent enough for this kind of work, and we also needed the migrated grammar in a very short time. So there was no time left for describing migration algorithms between the GWB and the ALEP platformsgif.

The migration has been done in two steps:

- porting of rules and migration of feature names onto ALEP type descriptions,

- precising the type system of ALEP, taking into account the filtering conditions of LFG and the kind of constraints used.

The work done so far has achieved an output equivalence between both grammars, having also an identical coverage of linguistic phenomena. This results have been obtained in a very short time (two days), taking into account that the person performing this migration had also to be introduced to the ALEP platform.



Thierry Declerck
Sat Sep 6 17:29:07 MET DST 1997